Citizen Warrior
12 Strange Muslim Rules
Sunday, March 7
THE FOLLOWING is a list of twelve odd facts about Islam — a list I found at IslamRevealed.com:
1. It is a sin to pluck your eyebrows.
2. It is against Islamic doctrine to have pictures in your home.
3. If a Muslim wife refuses to wear a veil, others will see her as her husband’s slave rather than his wife.
4. The punishment for having unmarried sex is whipping with a hundred lashes and then being exiled for a year.
5. Getting into Paradise is usually not a sure thing. Your good deeds must outweigh your bad deeds, but who knows for sure if they do? But there are three things you can do to guarantee you’ll make it to Paradise: a) killing a non-Muslim in battle, b) if two of your children were killed fighting for Allah, or c) memorizing the ninety-nine names of Allah.
6. Allah not just allows, but encourages Muslims to deceive non-Muslims if it will further the goals of spreading Islam.
7. Women are not allowed to wear hair extensions or a wig.
8. Wearing the color yellow is forbidden.
9. A Muslim must avoid yawning. Mohammad said, “Yawning is from Satan.”
10. Dogs should be killed. All dogs.
11. Mohammad recommended women breastfeed young men. Then the men are considered family and would be allowed to talk to the woman unveiled. However, once she breastfed him, he would not be allowed to marry her.
12. It is a sin to lie on your back and cross your feet.
Informative PDF Flyers on Islamic Supremacism Monday, February 1
THE LINKS BELOW go to PDF documents you can print out. These were created by Civilus Defendus to post as flyers, or to hand out to people who want more information. These PDF documents will print perfectly — just the way they were originally typeset — on any printer as long as you have an Adobe reader, which you can download for free here: Download Adobe Reader.
Civilus Defendus is the author of Citizens’ Declaration of Threat & Plea for Relief, and soon-to-be recipient of the Citizen Warrior Hero Award.
The original four-page flyer has three useful documents: Liberty Vs. Sharia, The Four Stages of Islamic Conquest, and The Muslim Brotherhood. The pages are well laid out, informative, and easy to understand. Click on the links below to print them. Note: It will take longer to call up these links than it does normal links because your computer has to open the Adobe Reader.
Or you can print them individually:
I’ll be putting a link to this page in the Citizen Warrior sidebar so you can come back any time and easily print a few more.
We need to concern ourselves with Just One Thing: Education About Islam.
Citizen Warrior
February 1, 2010
Islam’s Relentless Encroachment in Malaysia
Posted: 30 Jan 2010 03:17 PM PST 
MANY OF US forget that when we fight for freedom, when we speak up about Islam, even when when we initiate legislation for our own country, we are giving hope to millions around the world who live in countries already too far gone, where it is almost impossible to do anything about Islam’s relentless encroachment because Islam has wormed its way into the government and started making laws intended to protect Islam and diminish or eliminate all competing ways of life.
We received the following message from a woman named Jasmine who has written to us before:
Thank you Citizen Warrior. I’m from Malaysia (click on the map above to see a larger image), a Muslim majority country. Population is: 60 to 65% Malays, 20 to 25% Chinese and Indians about 10 to 15%.
All Malays MUST be Muslims. No freedom of choice for the Malays on religion; a sizeable proportion of the Indians are Muslims and some Chinese are Muslims.
If a non-muslim (usually a Chinese or Indian) wanted to marry a Malay, he/she has to be converted to the Islamic faith.
Our constitution says we have religious freedom. But slowly, the majority is pushing for Shari’a law. Recently, the government forbade the use of “Allah” in the Malay language, citing all Malays are Muslims and the use of “Allah” will confuse the Muslims.
BUT in East Malaysia, (Sabah & Sarawak States), the indigeneous people speak the Malay language. These Malay-speaking indigenous people are mostly Christians. Therefore when the Malay-speaking indigeneous people worship, the word “Allah” is used. They also use the Malay version of the Bible.
The court actually ruled that “Allah” can be used in the Malay language in translating or worshiping. There is mayhem, churches were attacked with one badly burnt on the ground floor. If you want more news from Malaysia, link to this site: http://www.malaysia-today.net
I’M SCARED FOR THE GENERATIONS TO COME.
Jasmine (I have changed her name at her request) also sent me this article: Malaysia and the Myth of Islamic Tolerance.
Sometimes when I read about how Islam works, how they gain power by gaining concessions until they have enough power to begin establishing laws, it all seems abstract or distant until I hear from someone to whom it is happening right now, and it makes it all too real.
In our quest to stop the third jihad, we need to be effective. The Islamic supremacists are not messing around. They are actively trying to influence governments all over the world to become more Islamic, and they are succeeding in Malaysia and many other places, including Egypt.
We must stop their encroachment. How? What can you do? I love that question! There are a lot of effective things you can do. Join ACT for America, get others to join, sign up for their newsletter, and sign up to give them a monthly contribution. Also, talk to people about Islam. Teach them what you know. And if you don’t know much about Islam or if you don’t know much about influencing people, tell people about the Girl Effect.
For many more ideas about how to defeat the third jihad, read What Can a Civilian Do?
Let’s get it done.
Is the Qur’an Similar to Mein Kampf? Friday, January 29
BIG THINGS are brewing in the Geert Wilders trial. And it may become a catalyst to a breakthrough in public awareness of the doctrines of Islam. In a recent Wall Street Journal article, Stop The Trial Of Geert Wilders, Leon de Winter wrote:The Amsterdam court trying the controversial Dutch politician is now preoccupied with the question of whether this book (the Qur’an), sacred to more than a billion believers, can be compared to one of the most vile publications in the history of Western civilization — Hitler’s “Mein Kampf.”
In his writing and speeches, Mr. Wilders has found these two works to be similar in terms of their anti-Semitism and incitement to hatred, and has thus called for a publishing ban on the Quran similar to the one in place for “Mein Kampf.” This is what triggered Mr. Wilders’s prosecution for discriminatory and insulting remarks against Muslims and Islam.
The court will have to determine just how similar the two books are! And they will do it on camera.
This trial may be the best thing that has ever happened to the citizen warriors of the world who have been trying to educate our fellow non-Muslims about Islam’s relentless encroachment. Geert’s trial is going to help bring to light the content of Islamic doctrine to an audience who would normally avoid the knowledge.
Thank you, Pastorius, for bringing this article to my attention.
Maybe Hell Froze Over Tuesday, January 26
SOMETHING WONDERFUL happened. Time Magazine published an article that takes the military to task for being too politically correct! Wow. In an article by Mark Thompson, entitled, “The Fort Hood Report: Why No Mention of Islam?” he writes:“…the lessons of 9/11, Afghanistan and Iraq, where jihadist extremism has driven deadly violence against Americans, are being not merely overlooked but studiously ignored.”
I couldn’t have put it better myself. In an effort to be politically correct or to avoid offending someone, the military has been deliberately overlooking what any fool can discover with a few hours of reading the Qur’an — that Islam is not a religion of peace.
But the era of blind multiculturalism is coming to an end. The stakes are too high now.
I’d like to thank Damien and Bosch Fawstin for bringing this encouraging milestone to my attention.
Geert Wilder’s Hearing Monday, January 25
Wednesday, January 20th, 2010, the trial of Geert Wilders began with a hearing. If you are not familiar with Geert’s situation, go here. At the hearing, Geert gave this speech:Mister Speaker, judges of the court,
I would like to make use of my right to speak for a few minutes.
Freedom is the most precious of all our attainments and the most vulnerable. People have devoted their lives to it and given their lives for it. Our freedom in this country is the outcome of centuries. It is the consequence of a history that knows no equal and has brought us to where we are now.
I believe with all my heart and soul that the freedom in the Netherlands is threatened. That what our heritage is, what generations could only dream about, that this freedom is no longer a given, no longer self-evident.
I devote my life to the defence of our freedom. I know what the risks are and I pay a price for it every day. I do not complain about it; it is my own decision. I see that as my duty and it is why I am standing here.
I know that the words I use are sometimes harsh, but they are never rash. It is not my intention to spare the ideology of conquest and destruction, but I am not any more out to offend people. I have nothing against Muslims. I have a problem with Islam and the Islamization of our country because Islam is at odds with freedom.
Future generations will wonder to themselves how we in 2010, in this place, in this room, earned our most precious attainment. Whether there is freedom in this debate for both parties and thus also for the critics of Islam, or that only one side of the discussion may be heard in the Netherlands? Whether freedom of speech in the Netherlands applies to everyone or only to a few? The answer to this is at once the answer to the question whether freedom still has a home in this country.
Freedom was never the property of a small group, but was always the heritage of us all. We are all blessed by it.
Lady Justice wears a blindfold, but she has splendid hearing. I hope that she hears the following sentences, loud and clear:
It is not only a right, but also the duty of free people to speak against every ideology that threatens freedom. Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States was right: The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
I hope that the freedom of speech shall triumph in this trial.
In conclusion, Mister Speaker, judges of the court.
This trial is obviously about the freedom of speech. But this trial is also about the process of establishing the truth. Are the statements that I have made and the comparisons that I have taken, as cited in the summons, true? If something is true then can it still be punishable? This is why I urge you to not only submit to my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of freedom of speech. But I ask you explicitly to honour my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of Islam. I refer not only to Mister Jansen and Mister Admiraal, but also to the witness/experts from Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Without these witnesses, I cannot defend myself properly and, in my opinion, this would not be an fair trial.
See him give the speech (in Dutch) here: Weblog Geertwilders.
Update on Geert’s trial: Wilders’ trial to resume in February.
What Does It Take To Get Through To People?
Wednesday, January 20
I RECENTLY RECEIVED the following email:I just read your article on Citizen Warrior, “the struggle to reach people“, along with many others. I’m from England in the UK and have to say I’ve had all the same reactions as Cheryl did in your article when discussing Islam. I’ve spent at least 6 months now spending my Sundays when I’m not busy researching thoroughly into jihad, Islamic teachings…etc. Everything I say about the issue to people is based on unbiased information and from Islamic teachings and quotes. Yet still, people have this political correctness and “you’re a racist!!!” barrier around themselves.
It scares me to think that within maybe 40 – 50 years my children may be living under Shari’a law…all because of the ignorance of everybody even when faced with facts and the truth is just too great.
I began researching into Islam after a conversation with an atheist or “infidel” and a Muslim. The atheist guy I knew was talking to me actually at work about how they were attempting to dominate the world and their view of Jews and infidels…etc., are inferior to believers of Islam…etc. I at that time thought the guy who was saying this to me was just being a typical racist…then this Muslim guy who’s a coworker butted in denying everything, and after an intense 2 minute argument…became a fight started by the Muslim.
That situation then actually really made me want to research into it…and by the way, I’ve even been deemed a “narrow-minded racist” for saying “Muslims” and categorising them as Muslims…now you see how ignorant people are…
Anyhow, I just thought I’d write to express how I got into the whole studying of Islam….and to actually have a conversation with someone who is educated on the topic and doesn’t spit on me and march off.
This brought up such an important point, I decided to ask him if I could publish his letter, to which he graciously agreed. Here is what I replied to him:
We have exactly the same problem here in the U.S. Anybody who has learned about Islam and tried to share what they know with friends runs into the same brick wall.
But we will get through to most people eventually. We just need to be smart about it, keep improving our persuasion methods, and never give up.
And this is really the main point I have tried to get across, and the point of awakening for me: That it’s not enough to be right. It’s not enough to know what you’re talking about. We will fail if we can’t get through, regardless of how correct we are. We have to be not only informed but good at getting through to people, and that cannot be done with forcefulness. You can’t make people get it when they don’t want to get it. You have to use “skillful means.”
After I wrote back to him, I realized this needs more explanation. What do I mean by “skillful means?” We need to develop the skill to influence what people believe. Simply delivering information doesn’t work most of the time, as I’m sure you’ve discovered.
And those of us who like to learn are in luck: There are so many books (on the subject of influencing others) it is almost overwhelming. As we study about Islam, we should also study how to influence people. It is at least as important. You should spend equal time on the two subjects.
The work we need to do is change minds, change beliefs. Do you know a lot about how to do that? Do you know how to gain and maintain rapport with people? Do you know how beliefs are changed? (Hint: It is not by arguing.)
What kind of books am I talking about? The classic on the subject is How to Win Friends & Influence People. It is about basic things like acknowledging people, listening well, finding common ground, becoming likeable, etc. If someone doesn’t like you, they find it much easier to reject what you’re saying. And because of the nature of your message, your listener may be looking for an excuse to reject it.
Even though How to Win Friends is basic, my observation is that most of us don’t actually practice those principles very often. If you’re having difficulty getting through to people, get that book and study it. And then practice those principles. It will increase your success rate.
The best way to take in this information is listening to CDs or a digital audio file, so you can listen repeatedly. Use your drive time to master this material. Take in a little every day and practice it every chance you get.
You are a citizen warrior and this is a key factor in your training. Sometimes a warrior needs to be trained in things she or he may not enjoy learning. Too bad. Trust me, you need to learn this material well if you want to be effective.
Once you’ve got that well in hand, the next level of skill is using principles of influence like social proof and commitment and consistency. These are from the excellent book, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion.
For advanced influencing techniques, I recommend these two books:
These deal with more sophisticated methods like matching and mirroring representational systems, posture and gestures, voice tone, tempo and volume, breathing rate, and specific words and phrases.
Those are NLP principles (Neurolinguistic Programming). NLP was created by studying outstanding therapists — psychotherapists who had exceptional success in treating patients. One of the most important people they studied was Milton Erickson, arguably the most successful therapist of all time. They noticed his point of view on “client resistance” was completely the opposite from that of less successful therapists.
The standard way of thinking about resistance in therapy is that it is the client’s problem and the client needs to get over it before therapy can proceed. Erickson’s point of view was that resistance was an indication that he, Milton Erickson, was being inept.
That’s the way we need to think about it. If we did, we could reach a whole new level of skill at influencing people.
You may not want to learn this. It may bother you that people don’t just “get it” when you say it straight. But this is how the world is. I know it’s not “right.” I know people should decide simply based on the facts, but that’s not how the world works, and it never will be. Emotions have a strong influence on decisions, on the forming of beliefs, and on behavior.
You already know this. You know that someone with a less-than-cogent argument can have more influence on people (if he gains rapport) than someone with a perfect argument that irritates people with his pompous or arrogant attitude, for example. Emotions trump facts. Rapport is the key.
We need to win. That means you, who already understand the terrifying brilliance of Islam, need to be effective. You need to use all the skillful means at your disposal to change the way others think and feel about Islam. You can do it! You must do it, for all our sakes.
If you don’t have time to become good at influencing, you should switch your focus to getting people involved in the Girl Effect. It will be much less difficult, but you will still be doing necessary work toward our ultimate goal of reversing Islam’s relentless encroachment on the free world.
Bill Gates Tells The Truth In Saudi Arabia Monday, January 18
I HAVE BEEN reading The Women’s Crusade in the New York Times, and came across the following passage and I knew I had to share it with you.Bill Gates recalls once being invited to speak in Saudi Arabia and finding himself facing a segregated audience. Four-fifths of the listeners were men, on the left. The remaining one-fifth were women, all covered in black cloaks and veils, on the right. A partition separated the two groups. Toward the end, in the question-and-answer session, a member of the audience noted that Saudi Arabia aimed to be one of the Top 10 countries in the world in technology by 2010 and asked if that was realistic. “Well, if you’re not fully utilizing half the talent in the country,” Gates said, “you’re not going to get too close to the Top 10.” The small group on the right erupted in wild cheering.
Bill Gates just went up a few notches in my esteem. The article I’ve quoted here was written by Sheryl WuDunn and Nicholas D. Kristof, the creators of the Girl Effect. I urge you to throw yourself into helping girls around the world. Go to the Girl Effect website and get involved. Recruit your friends and family into the cause. This is a purpose we can all get behind. Join the Girl Effect on FaceBook to get updates.
Read more about how helping girls can save the world in the book, Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide.
January 13, 2010
new from CitizenWarrior.com…![[Conversation-About-Girl-Effect.jpg]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__hspjzfC024/S0EekMvR2yI/AAAAAAAABOE/BMJsbaP86U4/s1600/Conversation-About-Girl-Effect.jpg) |
| Conversation PiecesPosted: 12 Jan 2010 01:54 PM PSTWHEN YOU ARE sharing what you know about Islam’s relentless encroachment on the free world, it often helps to have something compelling to share. Below are two shareable items to use in your campaign to influence your friends and family.The first was sent to me by a friend in Hawaii, entitled “Terrorism That’s Personal.” It is a set of 12 professional photographs of Muslim women who have been horribly scarred by acid thrown on their face. The damage done to these women is terrible to see. Shocking.Nicholas Kristof, one of the creators of the Girl Effect and a New York Times op-ed columnist, traveled to Pakistan last year. He wrote: “I’ve been investigating such acid attacks, which are commonly used to terrorize and subjugate women and girls in a swath of Asia from Afghanistan through Cambodia (men are almost never attacked with acid). Because women usually don’t matter in this part of the world, their attackers are rarely prosecuted and acid sales are usually not controlled. It’s a kind of terrorism that becomes accepted as part of the background noise in the region.”If you have have the stomach for it, view the pictures here. And share them with people you know. But when you do, make sure you give them some practical actions they can take to do something about it. Whenever you horrify someone, give them something they can do about it. It is unkind to do otherwise. With that in mind, here are the photographs: 12 Images.If those images don’t motivate someone to want to stop the atrocities, I don’t know what will. I also recommend you read and share Nicholas Kristof’s original article: Terrorism That’s Personal.
The second item I want to share with you is from one of my favorite columnists, Phyllis Chesler. In a recent article, she wrote: The other day, a twenty-year-old woman was sold at an open auction in Badani Bhutto, Pakistan. Her brothers divided up the money. No one condemned this shameless and abominable act. It is an act that haunts me. For a long time now, similar kinds of people (yes, mainly Muslims) have invaded — no, immigrated to — Europe, where they have continued to engage in polygamy, arranged child marriage, forced veiling of women, honor-related violence, including honor murders (17,000 honor-related crimes of violence have been estimated to occur annually in the UK alone), and female genital mutilation. According to my new (and about to be published) study, honor murders in Europe are especially savage — even more so than in developing Muslim countries. These two shareable items demonstrate the need to give women and girls human rights in Islamic countries. The situation is urgent, and anyone with normal human feelings will immediately know something needs to be done. If you’re talking to a friend who doesn’t want to hear about Islam, simply direct them to the Girl Effect or share with them the book, Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide. Your friend’s efforts to empower women and protect girls will help curb Islam’s ultimate goal, and it will be effective even if your friend never learns a thing about Islam. Read more about how to influence your friends: Think Small Bits and Long Campaigns. At the back of Half the Sky is a short section called Four Steps You Can Take in the Next Ten Minutes that has practical things you can do right now to help empower women. It has been reproduced online here: Four Steps. |
January 6, 2010
new from CitizenWarrior.com…
|
Action Alert: Support Geert WildersPosted: 05 Jan 2010 07:29 PM PST
 GEERT WILDERS’ trial is two weeks away (it is scheduled to take place January 20, 2010). Geert is on trial in Amsterdam for “inciting hatred against Islam.” This is our final opportunity to give him our support. (For more information about Geert’s trial, read an Update on Geert Wilders, watch an Interview With Geert Wilders, or read this article on what Wilders is charged with and why.)The international organization, SITA Action, wrote the following about the upcoming trial: The international establishment, subverted by a variety of Islamic organizations including the OIC (Organization of Islamic Conference) will undoubtedly apply a great deal of pressure on the Dutch establishment to ensure that Geert Wilders is convicted on the charges that have been cunningly brought against him. It is likely that his party will win the next election in 2011 with the possibility of Mr Wilders becoming Prime Minister. The global establishment (especially the influencial Islamic element) does not want Mr Wilders in such a position of influence, even if the people of the Netherlands do. An SITA action in support of Geert Wilders was established in late January 2009. It has received wide support and generated hundreds of letters designed to educate and inform decision makers in the Netherlands. The Dutch Ministery of Justice even visited our SITA websites: http://tinyurl.com/agl2kn. SITA action is now reactivated to highlight this apparently politically-motivated prosecution. If Geert Wilders falls, freedom of speech is dead in Europe. There are three ways that you can participate: 1) By mail – two possible texts; one comparing Wilders to Winston Churchill and another comparing him to Charlie Chaplin (follow either link, and you will find instructions about what to print and put into the envelopes and who to send them to). 2) By putting a message in comments to articles talking about the trial of Geert Wilders in blogs. This message appears at the bottom of this page http://tinyurl.com/yauuelo in 4 languages: FR, ENG, SP, D. So in other words, search Google for “Geert Wilders” and add those pre-written statements into the comments on the blogs you find (or add your own comments). To support Geert Wilders and our dearly acquired freedoms, please participate in the two suggested actions, and share this message with your friends, especially those who have websites or blogs so they can help spread the word. 3) By giving some money. To donate: http://www.geertwilders.nl. Take action right away for the greatest impact. Geert needs our help, and he deserves it. |
January 1, 2010
new from CitizenWarrior.com…
|
The World’s a MessPosted: 31 Dec 2009 11:59 PM PST
 THERE ARE a lot of problems in the world. But you can do one simple thing to help solve most of them: Support the Girl Effect.When you help a girl, you help produce a cascade of positive side-effects, but pertinent to our purposes here, it also helps curb Islam’s relentless expansion. For girls to gain and retain equal rights, Islam’s doctrine cannot be fully expressed. So fighting for women’s rights is effectively fighting against Islam’s ultimate goal of world domination. Even in free countries, the most effective tool against Islamic encroachment is the application of already-existing rights for women. Watch the Girl Effect video (below) and share it with your friends (it is two minutes long; click here to see the video): Your friends don’t need to know their efforts to help girls will accomplish the goal of curbing the spread of jihad. But it will. The Pentagon has discovered that the level of violence in a town can be predicted by simply looking at the number of girls who go to school in that town. No kidding. Girls are the key. And the key to helping girls is helping their mothers. To whatever degree you empower women by giving them legal rights, to that degree Islam’s relentless repression of women is necessarily weakened. Your friends and family may never know why you are so intense and urgent about the Girl Effect and it doesn’t matter — the work needs to be done and in the end we will all be better off. The only loser will be the insidious Islamic memeplex. This is a positive, life-affirming, inspiring way to defeat Islam’s relentless encroachment. Your friends will probably be relieved that you are finally into something so uplifting. Go to the Girl Effect website and get involved. Recruit your friends and family into the cause. This is a purpose we can all get behind. Join the Girl Effect on FaceBook to get updates. Read more about how helping girls can save the world in the book, Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide. Let’s do this. |
December 15, 2009
| new from CitizenWarrior.com… |
Questions for Every MuslimPosted: 14 Dec 2009 10:43 PM PST  The following was written by Bill Warner and originally published December 14, 2009 WHEN YOU STUDY the incident of Major Hasan at Fort Hood, you realize that there were some questions that needed to have been asked. But, no one knew what to ask, since the wrong questions might seem, well, politically incorrect. No one wants to be politically incorrect. We don’t want to offend.If you look around you will find that no one is asking any Muslims hard questions. Never mind the Major Hasan types, no one asks questions to the Muslim at work. It turns out that there are many questions that each and every Muslim should be asked. These are simple ones that deal with the core of Islam. Every Muslim knows the answers.“Do you believe that the Koran is perfect?” This is not offensive. Muslims must believe that the Koran is perfect, without error. They also believe that it is eternal and universal. Most of all, it came from the lips of Mohammed.“Is Mohammed the ideal Muslim? Should Muslims pattern their life after Mohammed?” Again, don’t worry that Muslims will find this awkward. Mohammed is admired, looked up to, and idealized. He is the perfect father, husband, friend, warrior, wise elder and best companion that could be.These questions establish the Islam of the believer. Every Muslim believes that the Koran is perfect, and Mohammed is the ideal human.Islam is only partially based on the Koran. Far more of a Muslim’s life is governed by Mohammed than the Koran and Allah. Why is this so important? The practical way to understand Islam and what Muslims believe and think is to know about Mohammed. This is very good news. Anyone can understand Mohammed’s life.However, once you get to know Mohammed, the perfect Muslim, Islam becomes problematic. From the first days of being a prophet Mohammed not only preached a better way of life, but he attacked all those who did not believe him. He created a new type of human being called the kafir, usually called unbeliever, but this is not an accurate translation. A kafir is the worst person in the world; an unbeliever is just someone who does not believe. A kafir can be mocked, deceived, tortured, enslaved, murdered, robbed, raped, and plotted against. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.
Now we are ready to ask a Muslim another question. “Am I a kafir?” The only answer is yes, but that is not the answer you will get. If you are a Christian you will be told no, you are a person of the Book. That sounds nice, but if you don’t believe that both Jesus and Mohammed were the prophets of Allah and that the Gospels are false, then you are a Christian kafir. They also might say that you are a non-Muslim, but that is not what the Koran says. The Koran says that you are a kafir. Now we come to more questions that should be asked, but most people do not have the knowledge to ask them, since the questions are based on knowing Mohammed’s life. As an example, Mohammed repeatedly advised Muslims to deceive kafirs if it would advance Islam. So: “Have you ever deceived a kafir?” is appropriate to ask. Mohammed assassinated kafirs, tortured, enslaved, robbed and plotted against them. His entire life as a prophet was an attempt to make kafirs submit to Islam by any means possible. It is proper then to ask: “How do you feel about what he did?” If you are a Christian, ask: “Over 60 million Christians have been killed in jihad. Christians are persecuted daily in Islamic lands. Have you ever apologized for this?” If you are a black American, ask: “Islam sold slaves on the West coast of Africa, the east coast of Africa and the Mediterranean. You enslaved over a million Europeans. Why do you never take any responsibility for slavery?” If you are a Jew, ask: “How do you see the war against Israel as jihad?” The other reason we do not ask questions is that we have become a nation of deceivers under political correctness. We don’t ask Muslims any question that would make them feel “uncomfortable.” It is completely reasonable to ask anyone about their ideology. Christians, Jews, liberals, conservatives and every other ideology have to answer questions about what they believe. Why not Muslims? That is the true question for kafirs: “Why are Muslims the only people in the world who don’t have to be asked difficult questions about what they believe?” All Muslims must answer questions about Islam, questions about Mohammed and the Koran for the only way to know a Muslim is to know their Islam. Bill Warner Permalink |
December 12, 2009
What About Islam? Thursday, December 10
I WAS WATCHING the FrontLine program,
Anti-Catholic 61
Anti-Protestant 57
Anti-Islamic 115
Anti-Other Religion 130
Anti-Multiple Religions, Group 62
Anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. 6
In the movie, Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West, there are several good examples, captured on film, of a Muslim leader speaking to Western media, saying one thing, and then speaking to their fellow Muslims saying just the opposite. You see them speaking peace and tolerance to Westerners and two days later vigorously preaching jihad against the West to their fellow Muslims. This is taqiyya.
Probably the single most important reason Jihadis have gotten away with so much is because they use deceit masterfully.
4. Bob pushes for concessions because he is special, unique, weird.
5. Bob seems really nice to everyone but his enemy. People usually recognize Bob is unusual, but they think he is innocent. But Dr. Marvin sees what he’s doing and how deliberately and insidiously he’s doing it.
Here’s another example of this principle, from DhimmiWatch:
“Palestinian jihad fighters have even used Christian sites and people as shields against the Israelis. In Spring 2002 they appropriated Bethlehem’s Manger Square as a base of operations, knowing that Israeli forces would not attack them there and would face international opprobrium if they did. This activity precipitated the siege of the Church of the Nativity in April and May of that year. After launching attacks against the Israelis from Manger Square, a group of jihadists fled into the church, where they remained for 39 days — secure in the knowledge that Israel would not attack a Christian holy site. Meanwhile, they desecrated the church.”
11. No matter what he does, Bob makes Dr. Marvin look like the mean one and Bob look like the innocent, underdog victim of Dr. Marvin’s apparently bad-tempered selfishness. Osama bin Laden’s plan was to run planes into the Twin Towers in the hopes that the U.S. would overreact, counting on the fact that the violent overreaction would cause Muslims around the world to unite against the West.
“From the beginning, the Palestinian strategy was, and still is, to provoke outrages to which Israel has had no choice but to respond with stringent countermeasures, thereby supplying endless footage of Palestinian casualties and eliciting fresh pressure by the West to accommodate ever-escalating Palestinian demands. Israel’s commitment to peace stimulated in the Palestinians not a spirit of reciprocal amicableness but an appetite for more…”
14. Bob knows full well what he’s doing, but successfully appears innocent to everyone but Dr. Marvin, who sees right through him but can’t get anyone else to see it. Those of us who have been trying to alert our fellow Westerners to Islam’s relentless encroachment are having a very difficult time.
Would you like to entertain yourself while watching a demonstration of Jihadi techniques? Watch What About Bob?
And while you’re watching, see if you can come up with ideas we can use. What would you do if you
new from CitizenWarrior.com…
|
|
Tolerance Should Go Both Ways Or Neither Posted: 06 Dec 2009 07:23 PM PST  I JUST READ something on our petition to stop Muslim immigration to America. After you sign the petition, you can leave a comment, and most people do. A woman left the following comment (#2588), and I thought it summarized a lot in few words. She wrote: “I’m as intolerant of the Koran as it is of me.”Her statement seems so fair. So reasonable. And yet to those who know what the Koran says, her statement is thoroughly anti-Islamic.
If you want to find out how intolerant the Koran is of you, I recommend reading the book. It’s not very long, and nobody else’s opinion will matter after that; you will have firsthand knowledge and can speak with authority. This is the version I recommend if English is your first language:
|
NOVEMBER 28, 2009
new from CitizenWarrior.com…
|
|
Don’t Slack Now — Our Efforts Are Working Posted: 28 Nov 2009 01:37 PM PST  WE’RE IN a difficult fight. Many of our own fellow citizens are resistant to hearing about Islamic Supremacism, and until a large number of us know about the terrifying brilliance of Islam, we can’t protect ourselves from its relentless encroachment.
This barely scratches the surface. The tide is changing. It is slow-going because so few non-Muslims know anything about the teachings of Islam. As more people find out, the momentum will increase. So don’t stop your efforts. We’re having an effect. But you know from personal experience that a vast majority of our fellow citizens still know almost nothing about Islam, and some of what they think they know is dead wrong. So keep up your education and persuasion efforts.
Some people have told me the media needs to do it. They implied, “I’m just one person and I can’t reach a vast audience, and since that’s what we need, it’s futile to try.” But nobody made a greater mistake, wrote Edmund Burke, than he who did nothing because he could only do a little
.
Here’s how it’s going to work: You educate your friends and family, even if it takes a year. Some of them educate their
friends and family. The process starts to accellerate. The market for this kind of information will grow, and the media will respond (they follow the money), and the process will accellerate even more. As more people understand what’s happening, the pressure on politicians will increase to change policies to protect our freedoms.
This process is already well underway. What can you do to help? Start here: What One Civilian Can Do To Stop Islam’s Relentless Encroachment.
In any difficult fight, it is important to celebrate the successes, to keep up our courage, to prevent discouragement. And to answer this need, in a recent article at PajamasMedia.com, Phyllis Chesler listed some of the recent successes in the free world:
|
new from CitizenWarrior.com…
|
|
Posted: 17 Mar 2009 11:16 PM PDT  WE’RE NOT yet able to devote ourselves full time to this work. If you’d like to help us make that dream a reality, here is one simple way you can help: When you buy anything from Amazon.com, use the link below.If you use the link above to get to Amazon, any products you buy will earn us a sales commission without costing you any extra. I’m going to keep a permanent link to this page in the upper right sidebar of CitizenWarrior.com so whenever you want to use the link you can easily find it. Thank you for your support.
|
November 26, 2009
|
Posted: 25 Nov 2009 12:49 PM PST  AFTER I POSTED a short notification about the film on HBO this month called Terror in Mumbai, I immediately heard from Civilus Defendus telling me that Surind’s link to watch the video online wasn’t working.
I contacted Surind and he found another source for it, which he has put on his page. Here’s the new link: |
new from CitizenWarrior.com…
|
Free Obsession ViewingPosted: 24 Nov 2009 06:00 PM PSTI RECEIVED the following message from the Clarion Fund. Their offer of free viewings of Obesession makes it really easy to share information with people you know. The offer ends December 10th. Let’s take full advantage of it. This is better than sending someone to YouTube to watch parts of the film. This is a professional website with more information on the subject easily available right there. Here’s Clarion’s message:THIS YEAR, America has witnessed an increased number of radical extremist incidents. The recent tragedy at Fort Hood is only one of many alarming plots carried out on our soil. The threats are very real.This Thanksgiving, we commemorate the one year anniversary of the attacks in Mumbai.We must pause on this day to acknowledge our liberties and recognize those that actively seek to destroy our values. To mark this day, the producers of the award-winning Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West are making the film available for free viewing online.The free stream campaign will run from Monday November 23 until December 10 at www.radicalislam.org/obsession.This campaign follows a highly successful free stream of The Third Jihad to mark the anniversary of 9/11. Over 35,000 viewers watched the film over the course of the 2 1/2 week campaign.Together, these films represent the best educational tools available for informing the public about the true threats of radical Islam.But, in order to spread the message, we need your help!
We greatly appreciate your help in making this campaign a success. If you have any feedback, comments or suggestions feel free to contact me at – |
new from CitizenWarrior.com…
|
|
Posted: 23 Nov 2009 04:47 PM PST  MY FRIEND Surind reminded me that HBO is showing a documentary several times this month on the 2008 Mumbai attacks. And if you don’t have cable, you can watch it online. To find out how, see Surind’s blog: SURIND.Watch it with friends and family. Use it as an opportunity to share with them what you know, or at least share with them the least they need to know. Prepare ahead of time. Make it count. The one thing we need to focus on is educating non-Muslims about Islam. This is a great opportunity to move ahead on that goal. |
Posted: 19 Nov 2009 12:37 AM PST
I RECEIVED the following article from a British citizen warrior and thought it was worthy of reprinting, which I am doing with permission. I think the idea has merit. It has an intelligent, potentially viral quality to it. What do you think?INTRODUCTION
The idea in the following text is being set forth for consideration by all who mourn the deaths of those who died at the hands of Islamic Supremacists on September 11th, 2001 on United Airlines Flight 93. I must emphasize at the outset that the approach is intended solely as a form of memorial and an aid in the healing process and is not meant to be interpreted as any form of political or religious communication. As many are aware, actions of a political or religious nature are forbidden in most workplaces. When others pick up this approach and hopefully disseminate it through blogs, websites and other media, it is hoped that they would keep this important point regarding the nature of the activity in mind.
BACKGROUND
United Airlines Flight 93 crashed into the ground in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania on September 11th, 2001 at 10:03:11 AM. Substantial evidence exists that the crash was preceded by a revolt among the passengers and crew against the Islamic Supremacist hijackers who had earlier taken over the airliner. This was the first time in recent history in which the intended victims of an Islamic Supremacist assault have been able to resist and thwart their plans.
PROPOSED ACTION
The people who took part in this act of resistance and died deserve to be memorialized. Therefore, we encourage everyone to set their watches to alarm at 10:03 AM, on a daily basis, as an audible form of memorial. This alarm can also serve as a reminder, at that time, to reflect upon the sacrifice which was made by the Flight 93 crew members and passengers.
Of course, we realize that the crash took place at 10:03 AM (Eastern Standard Time), meaning that some people in other time zones might view a more appropriate time to memorialize would be in their own respective times which would correspond with 10:03 AM EST. However, a pursuit of such an option would significantly confuse things. Therefore, we urge that you honor the time of 10:03 AM, irrespective of the time zone.
EFFECT OF THE ACTION
In presenting this idea for implementation, it is important that we examine the potential effect of a watch alarm going off at 10:03 AM in various settings. First and foremost, on Mondays through Fridays, most people at this time would be out in the “real world”. Most likely they would be at work. Other options include being in a bus, subway, train or airliner. On weekends, they could possibly be at a movie, sports event or religious activity. The possibilities are numerous. In each of these instances it is highly probable that the person wearing the alarming watch will be accompanied by someone whom they already know. It is also reasonable to presume that this nearby person will ask the wearer of the watch why the alarm went off. This would, in turn, give the watch wearer the perfect opportunity to explain the memorial purpose of the alarm. If the explanation inspires the listener, they, too, may begin to set their own watch at 10:03 AM. And so on.
It is conceivable that many people who hear the alarm (as in a work meeting) and are unaware of its meaning may quickly view it as an insignificant interruption. Two alarms from two different people going off at the same time in the same setting changes the picture entirely. This will cause everyone to realize that something is going on. It will also show each respective wearer of the alarming watches that they are not alone in their state of mourning. Depending on the type of setting, such a situation may lead to an exponential increase in the number of watches alarming at 10:03 AM.
HANDLING POTENTIAL OBJECTIONS
Multiple watches simultaneously alarming in most non-work settings would not seem to pose a problem. If some people object, so be it. This now brings us to the thorny question of work environments which are “politically correct” (quite prevalent in Europe). Supervisors or Human Resources personnel may (incorrectly) say that the watch alarm is “offensive” political or religious speech and cannot be tolerated. As stated above (and hopefully in any distributions by others of this concept), this activity was intended at the very outset as a way in which a person can cope with their grieving over this specific incident on September 11th, 2001 and assist in healing. As such, an employee in such a situation could argue that a company in such a situation is trying to interfere with their psychological and spiritual health and well being. They could point out that no employer would be disrespectful of the coping mechanisms of an employee who recently lost a family member. With this in mind, we could ask on what basis would they have to interfere here? Who defines the time limits of mourning? Who can say how long it takes to recover? In fact, it is possible that some of those who alarm their watches will actually be personal friends or family members (distant or close) of the non-Islamic Supremacist individuals on Flight 93. A quick internet search can reveal details regarding their respective lives.
Of course, a politically correct employer who provides time for fellow Islamic Supremacist employees (if any) to take time out of the work day for multiple prayers would seem to stand on flimsy grounds in objecting to the watch alarms. The watch wearer could invoke similar claims of religious rights, if a company makes religious concessions to others. After all, the border between mourning and religious beliefs can be quite porous in some individuals. However, this action is specifically intended to be of a “mourning” nature and does not have a religious emphasis. Whether an individual goes that extra step into the religious realm, in the face of various pre-existing religious practices in the workplace being practiced and tolerated is up to them.
There is also the possibility that, quite coincidentally, some people at work who have their watches set at 10:03 AM could be doing so to remind them to perform some medically necessary task, such as taking a vitamin or checking their pulse. The performance of this task could have actually been prescribed by an understanding physician or even an itinerant natural healer. An employer’s interference in this, or any other health matter, could be viewed as highly questionable.
Regarding an employer’s objection to alarms based on their “interfering with work”, the question could be raised to them as to whether they are willing to stop an even worse interference: the ringing of employee cell phones. It would be interesting to see how employees would react to a cell phone prohibition, particularly when considering that so many people are dependent on them for making family arrangements and so forth.
The key thing to do when considering potential employer resistance to watch alarms is to check your employee handbook first. Then, consider the above text and contemplate a suitable response in advance of being questioned. Effective mourning need not require that an alarm run continuously; even one or two “beeps” could have the same effect.
FURTHER ELABORATION ON THE EFFECT OF THIS ACTION
The ultimate effect of all of this is that individual members of the general public will gradually become aware of a considerable amount of sympathy among their fellow citizens for the passengers and crew of United Airlines Flight 93; people who successfully thwarted the heinous plans of Islamic Supremacist hijackers. At some point, this level of sympathy being expressed in daily life will be impressed upon the media and government officials who control much of our public discourse. Effectively, us mourners will finally break out of the limiting internet realm and become visible in the outside world on a daily basis. This is exceedingly important. We need a way for others to outwardly perceive, or at least deduce, our feelings. When people actually “see” that others in the outside world share their own perspective, they will become emboldened and more likely to speak up regarding their own mourning. But as it stands with this writing, people are afraid to “stand out”.
It is regrettable that some would view the watch alarms as a political or religious tactic. Again, it must be emphasized that the intent is solely to memorialize and assist in the healing process. If this idea is incorrectly promulgated as any form of political or religious action, employers would have ammunition to ban it.
An Op-Ed by Representative Sue Myrick
Posted: 24 Oct 2009 02:22 PM PDT
Editor’s Note: The following is an article by PinkNeck. You can check out her blog at PinkNeck.com.
![[CAIR-HAMAS.jpg]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_O8o97SWVvkA/St9iwfRnCqI/AAAAAAAAAAw/EgN3Dzpv_t8/s1600/CAIR-HAMAS.jpg)
I WANT TO SHARE this op-ed. I think it’s important.
C.A.I.R., the Council on American Islamic Relations, is one of the largest and most well-funded Muslim organizations in our country. But they’re not the moderate Muslim group they say they are. They’re actually a front for the terrorist group HAMAS.
C.A.I.R. attacks those that try to speak the truth about what they are up to, like how they’re placing C.A.I.R. interns in our government offices. Few people have the courage to go up against any terrorist organization, but Representative Sue Myrick is speaking out. C.A.I.R., of course, is doing everything they can to stop her. But she’s standing her ground.
I know you’re busy. And I know this isn’t a pleasant topic, but it’s a real threat. The goal of C.A.I.R. is to destroy our democracy by infiltrating our government and eventually replacing our government with Shari’a law. Europe looked the other way for far too long and now they are having terrible problems. We can’t afford to look the other way. We can’t afford to believe what they say and ignore what they do.
I’ll get off my soap box. Myrick says it much better than I do, and with a great deal more authority.
Here’s what she said:
Last week, I held a press conference on Capitol Hill attended by three of my colleagues in the House of Representatives to call for a federal investigation (s) into a non-profit group called the Council on American Islamic Relations (C.A.I.R.)
Here are the facts:
1. CAIR has documented ties to the terrorist organization HAMAS. This is stated fact by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
In an April 28, 2009 letter to US Senator Jon Kyl, the FBI wrote the following:
“As you know, CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development in the United States v. Holy Land Foundation et al. (Cr. No. 3:04-240-P (N.D.TX.). During that trial, evidence was introduced that demonstrated a relationship among CAIR, individual CAIR founders (including its current President Emeritus and its Executive Director) and the Palestinian Committee. Evidence was also introduced that demonstrated a relationship between the Palestinian Committee and HAMAS, which was designated a terrorist organization in 1995. In light of that evidence, the FBI suspended all formal contacts between CAIR and the FBI.”
In case you are not familiar with the Holy Land trial referenced above, it was a Dallas, Texas trial that ended with guilty verdicts on 108 counts of funneling money ($12 million) to HAMAS.
2. The purpose of our press conference was to make public an internal CAIR memo that documented CAIR’s stated goal of placing CAIR interns in the offices of members of Congress, especially the members who serve on the Homeland Security, Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. Let me be clear here, CAIR, a group whom the FBI says is affiliated with the terrorist group HAMAS, is trying to place their interns in the offices of those members who serve on the three committees that handle national security related issues. National Security is the first responsibility of the federal government.
3. Following our press conference, CAIR, immediately labeled we four members as bigots and started their public relations campaign to discredit us by claiming that we were against Muslims working on Capitol Hill. We never said that. At no time during our press conference did we even insinuate that we were investigating Muslims being interns on Capitol Hill. Go to http://www.youtube.com/suemyricknc09 and watch the press conference yourself.
Our focus was and is on CAIR and CAIR alone, not Muslims.
Likewise CAIR tried to make this a Republican vs. Democrat thing, because the four members at the press conference happened to be Republican.
How then does CAIR explain Democrat Senator Charles Schumer’s call earlier this year for a government-wide ban on CAIR in the federal government due to their ties to HAMAS? Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer has likewise made public her opinions of CAIR and any Google search will find her remarks.
4. CAIR is spending time, money and energy to position themselves as the spokespeople for the moderate Muslim community. Problem is CAIR is not a moderate Muslim organization. It is a radical front group for HAMAS. So who is CAIR competing with for this designation? The real moderate Muslim groups/individuals in America. Groups and individuals like the following who are committed to countering Islamist extremism:
Dr. Hedieh Mirahmadi – President World Organization for Resource Development and Education (WORDE)
Zeyno Baran – Director for the Center for Eurasian Policy at the Hudson Institute
Farid Ghadry – President of the Reform Party of Syria
Manda Zand Ervin – Founder and director of the Alliance of Iranian Women
Omran Salman – Arab Reformists Project, ‘Aafaq (Arabic for “horizons”).
Dr. Zuhdi Jasser – American Islamic Forum for Democracy
Karim Bromund – Director of Inter-Religious Affairs for the Islamic Supreme Council of America
I SUPPORT the Muslim individuals and groups mentioned above. These groups renounce terrorists and their radical ideology. They are trying their hardest to be heard and recognized in America, but are being overshadowed and out-funded by CAIR. Today, when something happens that impacts the Muslim community, the media calls CAIR (an unindicted co-conspirator to terrorism and a HAMAS front group) for comment on behalf of American Muslims. What an insult the media is performing on the Muslim community. Instead they should be calling Muslim groups/individuals like those named above. This is part of the reason we are focusing our attention on CAIR and exposing them for who they are. For one they pose a threat to our national security, and two, they deny the ability of legitimate Muslim groups to gain credibility.
5. In July of this year I held a summit on Capitol Hill where I introduced the leaders of eight moderate Muslim organizations to the heads of several US Agencies, Members of Congress and congressional staff. For example, they met with representatives from the State Department, USAID, Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense. How can I be against Muslims working on Capitol Hill and hold such an event? Go to http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3881/pub_detail.asp and read for yourself about this summit.
See through the lies and realize what is really going on here.
We are trying to expose a HAMAS Front Group (CAIR) for who they are, and they are crying we are anti-Muslim hoping that media outlets will ignore the terrorist claim and instead pick it up as a race/religion story. When those claims don’t work, they claim it’s a Republican political thing.
Americans, on this subject we need to stop the Republican vs. Democrat, Conservative vs. Liberal, Christian vs. Muslim division and unite on one simple point…. CAIR is a front group for HAMAS. It was named as an un-indicted co-conspirator in a terrorism case that lead to 108 convictions of funneling $12 million to HAMAS. Because of the evidence produced in that case, the FBI severed all ties with them. This same CAIR, by their own admission, is trying to place people inside the offices of members of Congress who deal with national security issues (judiciary, homeland security and intelligence committees). I serve on one of those committees, Intelligence, am the co-chairwoman of the House Anti-Terrorism Caucus, and have spent the better part of the last four years working every day on terrorism related issues.
If we Americans fail to set aside our political, religious and ideological differences and unite when we encounter the enemy in such stark and plain terms, then God help us.
6 Comments to “Citizen Warrior”
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
By Eura Steinke, December 27, 2009 @ 2:08 pm
I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.
By colorado dui, January 24, 2010 @ 10:49 pm
Seriously? Don’t misunderstand what I mean, I concur with you partly, but when you say something like this you really need to be prepared to defend it.
By Product Reviews, January 29, 2010 @ 9:45 pm
I am glad that I stumbled upon your site on Bing. I really enjoyed your post. If you are interested in exchanging links with each other’s sites, let me know. I’d love to get on each other’s blogrolls. Here is my site: Lose The Back Pain Scam.
By co jewelry, February 8, 2010 @ 12:14 pm
Hi, I applaud your blog for informing people, very interesting article, keep up it coming
By Alden Formby, February 16, 2010 @ 11:00 pm
I found your blog when searching Google for infomation about mortgage net branch companies
By armani watches, February 17, 2010 @ 8:31 am
I Like this site your article is very nice , Thanks, very interesting article, keep up it coming